VDA Maturity Level Assurance for New Parts (EN)

Maturity level assurance for new parts. Methods, measurement criteria, documentation. 3rd, revised edition, June 2022

English language version

The book is available on the client’s request. The waiting time for delivery is up to 30 business days. The order is associated with an additional transport fee from external warehouse in the amount of 130 PLN net.Maturity level assurance for new parts. Methods, measurement criteria, documentation. 3rd, revised edition, June 2022

English language version

The book is available on the client’s request. The waiting time for delivery is up to 30 business days. The order is associated with an additional transport fee from external warehouse in the amount of 130 PLN net.Maturity level assurance for new parts. Methods, measurement criteria, documentation. 3rd, revised edition, June 2022

English language version

The book is available on the client’s request. The waiting time for delivery is up to 30 business days. The order is associated with an additional transport fee from external warehouse in the amount of 130 PLN net.Maturity level assurance for new parts. Methods, measurement criteria, documentation. 3rd, revised edition, June 2022

English language version

The book is available on the client’s request. The waiting time for delivery is up to 30 business days. The order is associated with an additional transport fee from external warehouse in the amount of 130 PLN net.

304.50  (290.00  netto)

Available on backorder

VDA Maturity Level Assurance for New Parts (EN)

Description

Maturity level assurance for new parts. Methods, measurement criteria, documentation. 3rd, revised edition, June 2022

This VDA publication focuses on a comprehensive and consistent presentation of maturity levels within the framework of progress in a project covering new parts, combined with an assessment of the maturity of the product and manufacturing process at agreed times within the product creation process. The maturity level assurance method can be applied both in internal customer-supplier relationships (within an organization, e.g. groups of companies) and in external customer-supplier relationships (between an organization and its customer or between the organization and its supplier). A significant element is therefore the rules covering cooperation at all stages in the supply chain, with the integration of all those involved in the project. To this end, important customer-supplier relationships are defined within the framework of milestone assessments in projects (new projects, face-lifts or other modification projects initiated by the customer), a concrete cooperation model in the project is described and thus the early, cross-functional integration of all those involved is assured.

The most significant changes and adaptations which have been made are:

– Revision of the set of measurement criteria based on user feedback in accordance with a continual improvement process, and new requirements

– Introduction of further measurement criteria for product maturity level assurance

– Integration of further measurement criteria and notes regarding software maturity level assurance, including requirements with regard to automotive cybersecurity

– Additions to the notes on the measurement criteria to include the principles of agile collaboration between the customer and the supplier

– Revision of A, B, and C risk classification, inclusion of specific contents pertaining to the use of software in the vehicle

– Definition of A-, B-, C-, D-samples and assignment to the maturity levels.

REMARK: English version.Field failure analysis, Joint Quality Management in the Supply Chain Marketing and Service, 1st edition: July 2009

Despite every effort in the development and production processes to provide mature, robust problem-free products to the customer, deviations from the expected performance may occur when the vehicle is in use. Depending on the problem, the defective parts or vehicle components are replaced and the vehicle manufacturer (OEM) or supplier may ask for them to be returned, via the OEM, for analysis.

The field failure analysis of defective parts returned from the field plays a fundamental and multiple role in this area of conflict between quality and costs. It is agreed that, of all the failures reported world-wide, an appropriate number will be returned to the component manufacturer, representing the failure event reported in the market (the so-called reference market procedure). The supplier carries out an analysis of the rejected parts. If a failure is verified, the supplier analyses the root cause and determines who caused the problem. A problem-solving process is initiated by the automobile manufacturer and/or the supplier, depending on who caused the problem.Maturity level assurance for new parts. Methods, measurement criteria, documentation. 3rd, revised edition, June 2022

This VDA publication focuses on a comprehensive and consistent presentation of maturity levels within the framework of progress in a project covering new parts, combined with an assessment of the maturity of the product and manufacturing process at agreed times within the product creation process. The maturity level assurance method can be applied both in internal customer-supplier relationships (within an organization, e.g. groups of companies) and in external customer-supplier relationships (between an organization and its customer or between the organization and its supplier). A significant element is therefore the rules covering cooperation at all stages in the supply chain, with the integration of all those involved in the project. To this end, important customer-supplier relationships are defined within the framework of milestone assessments in projects (new projects, face-lifts or other modification projects initiated by the customer), a concrete cooperation model in the project is described and thus the early, cross-functional integration of all those involved is assured.

The most significant changes and adaptations which have been made are:

– Revision of the set of measurement criteria based on user feedback in accordance with a continual improvement process, and new requirements

– Introduction of further measurement criteria for product maturity level assurance

– Integration of further measurement criteria and notes regarding software maturity level assurance, including requirements with regard to automotive cybersecurity

– Additions to the notes on the measurement criteria to include the principles of agile collaboration between the customer and the supplier

– Revision of A, B, and C risk classification, inclusion of specific contents pertaining to the use of software in the vehicle

– Definition of A-, B-, C-, D-samples and assignment to the maturity levels.

REMARK: English version.Field failure analysis, Joint Quality Management in the Supply Chain Marketing and Service, 1st edition: July 2009

Despite every effort in the development and production processes to provide mature, robust problem-free products to the customer, deviations from the expected performance may occur when the vehicle is in use. Depending on the problem, the defective parts or vehicle components are replaced and the vehicle manufacturer (OEM) or supplier may ask for them to be returned, via the OEM, for analysis.

The field failure analysis of defective parts returned from the field plays a fundamental and multiple role in this area of conflict between quality and costs. It is agreed that, of all the failures reported world-wide, an appropriate number will be returned to the component manufacturer, representing the failure event reported in the market (the so-called reference market procedure). The supplier carries out an analysis of the rejected parts. If a failure is verified, the supplier analyses the root cause and determines who caused the problem. A problem-solving process is initiated by the automobile manufacturer and/or the supplier, depending on who caused the problem.Maturity level assurance for new parts. Methods, measurement criteria, documentation. 3rd, revised edition, June 2022

This VDA publication focuses on a comprehensive and consistent presentation of maturity levels within the framework of progress in a project covering new parts, combined with an assessment of the maturity of the product and manufacturing process at agreed times within the product creation process. The maturity level assurance method can be applied both in internal customer-supplier relationships (within an organization, e.g. groups of companies) and in external customer-supplier relationships (between an organization and its customer or between the organization and its supplier). A significant element is therefore the rules covering cooperation at all stages in the supply chain, with the integration of all those involved in the project. To this end, important customer-supplier relationships are defined within the framework of milestone assessments in projects (new projects, face-lifts or other modification projects initiated by the customer), a concrete cooperation model in the project is described and thus the early, cross-functional integration of all those involved is assured.

The most significant changes and adaptations which have been made are:

– Revision of the set of measurement criteria based on user feedback in accordance with a continual improvement process, and new requirements

– Introduction of further measurement criteria for product maturity level assurance

– Integration of further measurement criteria and notes regarding software maturity level assurance, including requirements with regard to automotive cybersecurity

– Additions to the notes on the measurement criteria to include the principles of agile collaboration between the customer and the supplier

– Revision of A, B, and C risk classification, inclusion of specific contents pertaining to the use of software in the vehicle

– Definition of A-, B-, C-, D-samples and assignment to the maturity levels.

REMARK: English version.Field failure analysis, Joint Quality Management in the Supply Chain Marketing and Service, 1st edition: July 2009

Despite every effort in the development and production processes to provide mature, robust problem-free products to the customer, deviations from the expected performance may occur when the vehicle is in use. Depending on the problem, the defective parts or vehicle components are replaced and the vehicle manufacturer (OEM) or supplier may ask for them to be returned, via the OEM, for analysis.

The field failure analysis of defective parts returned from the field plays a fundamental and multiple role in this area of conflict between quality and costs. It is agreed that, of all the failures reported world-wide, an appropriate number will be returned to the component manufacturer, representing the failure event reported in the market (the so-called reference market procedure). The supplier carries out an analysis of the rejected parts. If a failure is verified, the supplier analyses the root cause and determines who caused the problem. A problem-solving process is initiated by the automobile manufacturer and/or the supplier, depending on who caused the problem.Maturity level assurance for new parts. Methods, measurement criteria, documentation. 3rd, revised edition, June 2022

This VDA publication focuses on a comprehensive and consistent presentation of maturity levels within the framework of progress in a project covering new parts, combined with an assessment of the maturity of the product and manufacturing process at agreed times within the product creation process. The maturity level assurance method can be applied both in internal customer-supplier relationships (within an organization, e.g. groups of companies) and in external customer-supplier relationships (between an organization and its customer or between the organization and its supplier). A significant element is therefore the rules covering cooperation at all stages in the supply chain, with the integration of all those involved in the project. To this end, important customer-supplier relationships are defined within the framework of milestone assessments in projects (new projects, face-lifts or other modification projects initiated by the customer), a concrete cooperation model in the project is described and thus the early, cross-functional integration of all those involved is assured.

The most significant changes and adaptations which have been made are:

– Revision of the set of measurement criteria based on user feedback in accordance with a continual improvement process, and new requirements

– Introduction of further measurement criteria for product maturity level assurance

– Integration of further measurement criteria and notes regarding software maturity level assurance, including requirements with regard to automotive cybersecurity

– Additions to the notes on the measurement criteria to include the principles of agile collaboration between the customer and the supplier

– Revision of A, B, and C risk classification, inclusion of specific contents pertaining to the use of software in the vehicle

– Definition of A-, B-, C-, D-samples and assignment to the maturity levels.

REMARK: English version.Field failure analysis, Joint Quality Management in the Supply Chain Marketing and Service, 1st edition: July 2009

Despite every effort in the development and production processes to provide mature, robust problem-free products to the customer, deviations from the expected performance may occur when the vehicle is in use. Depending on the problem, the defective parts or vehicle components are replaced and the vehicle manufacturer (OEM) or supplier may ask for them to be returned, via the OEM, for analysis.

The field failure analysis of defective parts returned from the field plays a fundamental and multiple role in this area of conflict between quality and costs. It is agreed that, of all the failures reported world-wide, an appropriate number will be returned to the component manufacturer, representing the failure event reported in the market (the so-called reference market procedure). The supplier carries out an analysis of the rejected parts. If a failure is verified, the supplier analyses the root cause and determines who caused the problem. A problem-solving process is initiated by the automobile manufacturer and/or the supplier, depending on who caused the problem.

Additional information

Dimensions 210 × 150 × 5 mm